Search This Blog

Sunday, June 5, 2011

Terrence Malick's Song of Himself IV - The New World: Forces of Language













Everywhere we go we encounter language, whether it regards the social functions of spoken dialogue or the meditative functions of what is unspoken and interior. There nevertheless remain words, symbols, signs, syntax, oftentimes incomplete and fragmentary, so intimate as to be embarrassing at times, and incoherent. Articulation is something that we might take for granted. Words and language are the fabric of our thoughts and consciousness, though maybe the content of those words are closer to Gertrude Stein than to a conventional prose stylist. It might not sound logical, and yet linguistics – since Chomsky – reveal how Stein was correct in her deconstructions. The ability to fluently express, socially, thoughts as language is terribly complicated. How do Beings reveal themselves? Perhaps one's relationship or attitudes regarding God – in whatever form or absence – and Love – perhaps also in whatever form – are the most perilous things to replicate through words, even though they inspire people to do so, again and again, too often faltering, too often being dishonest even against one's realization. God and Love have given birth to some pretty good poems, and countless bad ones.

Terrence Malick's The New World is as encompassed by Language as it is by Romantic Love. It is probably the filmmaker's most maddening picture (I would say it is much more dissonant than The Tree of Life, though the latter remains a more audacious work), and having a familiar, archetypal narrative (the story of Pocahontas and John Smith), it is as avant-garde a moderately budgeted film a studio (New Line) has ever released. The New World shows the traps of language and thought, in addition to its liberations. Formally, it is as unbounded, fertile, and filled with growth as the unconquered natural environment of early 17th century Virginia that it depicts. Luxurious in its beauty, though hardly lush in the same way as every other historical epic or romance, it nevertheless persistently chimes notes of dissonance with the audience, deliberately colliding and overwhelming, much as the reeds and grass do to John Smith (Colin Farrell) when he's lost in the forest, shortly before his capture by the Native Americans, here dubbed "the Naturals" by Captain Newport (Christopher Plummer). Spaced throughout its fertility are moments of complete aesthetic arrest, denoting spiritual ascendency – also unmatched by other historical films and romances. Through its storm of Nature, conquest, passions, and discoveries, characters are searching for the sublime, both in the Ethereal (Pocahontas' need to understand the Mother, which is the Over-Soul in Nature) and the Terrestrial (John Smith's quest for the Indies, or a new land where civilization can essentially start over, away from the materialist spoils that have corrupted things elsewhere). The journey takes an outward trajectory, but leads ultimately inward. The only Truth is in that space, the mythological "romance in the forest" that is colored and framed by ingenious subjectivity.
The New World begins over water, the sky and looming trees above reflected on its surface. We notice an array of contrasts, calling attention to the nature of binaries. The water seems still, but it becomes evident that the camera is moving over it. The world above is replaced by the world below, as the dense plant life beneath the water becomes more visible. "Come Spirit," Pocahontas' voice narrates. "Sing us the story of our land. You are our Mother. We, Your field of calm. We rise from out of the soul of You." Malick cuts from the ground perspective, as Pocahontas (Q'orianka Kilcher) raises her arms to the sky, a bird calling distantly. As in the conclusion of The Thin Red Line, being "in one's Soul," which is say "Being," is to be in the Soul of All. Beings are elsewhere trapped within their flesh-selves, either pining for freedom or dominating other beings. The cycle of colonial power and domination is laid out in three dimensional drawings during the credits, showcasing slaughter as explorers arrive in the Americas.
Wagner's Das Rheingold music begins to stir awake. Under the water, three fish pass by, then three naked women swimming freely. Above water three great ships approach the shore. The Wagner grows in its glorious momentum as characters from both cultures – the Natives and the Colonials – stare in amazement at what draws nearer. Emerging from a dark cell and in chains is John Smith, who regardless of his present situation (he's apparently been accused of mutiny and is to hang) is rapt and filled with happiness. Through his cell window (shaped conspicuously like the film's photographic aspect ratio) he frames the glory of this present moment.
The use of Wagner is more effective than an original score ever could be, and Malick's talent for using source music remains close to incomparable; the Wagner music is known for how it flows like water, which is the same instruction the director often gives to his composers. But the music intertextually also reinforces particular themes, suggesting the hidden ideas implicit within The New World. In the Wagner opera, this prelude is the score to the dwarf Alberich rejecting love and stealing the Rhine Gold from the Ring Maidens (of which there are three). We can paint some parallels between Alberich's rejection of love and quest for Gold that will enable him to rule the world, and European explorers who will pillage and exploit resources. But it also gets to the heart of Smith's tragedy, who is the most noble and possibly intelligent of the ship's crew. He dreams of his Utopia and New World which Virginia seems to offer: "A world equal to our hopes. A land where one might wash one's soul pure. Rise to one's true stature. We shall make a new start, a fresh beginning. Here the blessings of the Earth are bestowed upon all. None need grow poor. Here there is good ground for all. And no cost but one's labor. We shall build a true commonwealth, hard work and self reliance our virtues. We shall have no landlords to wrack us with high rents or extort the fruit of our labor." (I find it interesting that before The New World, Malick was preparing a biopic of Che Guevara, eventually directed by Steven Soderbergh; there seems to be similarities of idealism in John Smith and Che). Other passengers proclaim how they'll "live like kings," with the oysters in the ocean and "fish flapping against your legs."
We know how Smith will fall in love with Pocahontas, the Native princess who saves his life from an execution by her father, Chief Powhatan (August Schellenberg). And yet something puzzling about The New World is the struggle Smith has in remaining with her. He is very wary of social duty and making his affections for Pocahontas known. Ultimately, he will choose the false path of glory, his high calling to "cross the threshold" in exploration and charting geographical territory, in favor of loving Pocahontas "in the forest." His rejection of love leads him to have a melancholy realization about his ideals, his "Indies." "I may have sailed past them," he says, knowing that Pocahontas was the embodiment of all that he ever dreamed.
I have to go back to language in discussing The New World, associating it with the dreams of human beings that steal into their destinies. The first diagetic words uttered in the film are by Newport: "Let him go," in reference to Smith, waiting at the gallows with a noose around his neck. Smith, like Europe, is offered a new start and the potential for Freedom, which is a powerful Malick obsession in a world featuring frames, cages, and markers of merit and identity. Smith must have a rather unruly personality to have wound up on the gallows to begin with, just as his nobility and intelligence compel Newport to free him. Smith's impulse to freedom (so leading to "mutinous remarks") associates with how he follows his intuition, intuition being related to some elliptical voice. "Who are You whom I so faintly hear?" he asks in his mind. "Who urge me ever on? What voice is this that speaks within me? Guides me towards the best? Where? Always the star was guiding me. Leading me. Drawing me on to the fabled land. There life shall begin."
Intuition is the gift of listening to the voice that speaks within, as opposed to the "blah" existence of blindly following sensations or impulses ("I'm hungry" and "My stomach hurts," or "Just felt like it," as in Badlands; the blinding jealousies and desperation in Days of Heaven). Smith's is not a passive existence. The world lives for him. The first time he sees Pocahontas is, suitably, as she seems to materialize out of the grass, as if she too was grass (and later on she will tell John Rolfe, "We're like grass.") This points to the purpose of Malick's voiceover, which too many critics and commentators believe is a gimmick, or a simple lazy tool for relaying narrative. The voice within the conscious individual, aware of Being and receptive to it, never ceases to speak. The New World, more than any other Malick picture, submerges into the inner voice of its three principle characters (Smith, Pocahontas, and John Rolfe). We may notice that another character, the brutish and opportunistic Captain Argall (Yorick van Wageningnan), does not speak in voiceover, but one moment speaks aloud to himself: "Conscience is a nuisance. A fly, a barking dog. If you don't believe you have one, what trouble can it be to you?" That these words are spoken aloud and not in Malick's voiceover is significant, because it demonstrates how Argall, like most of the characters in the film, is too extroverted in his thinking to have any insight or sympathy. We can compare Argall's thinking to what immediately follows, as his captive, Pocahontas, closes her eyes and raises her hands to the sky, thinking her meditation: "Mother, You are my strength. Or I have none." In estranging ourselves from the inner voice, by "being in the world," we lose our connection to Being – in the World.
This large issue of language and communication is naturally evident in how we observe two cultures unable to comprehend each other, and often not attempting to even imagine that the Other is unable to comprehend them. When the two groups first meet, a Native and Newport seem to have a basic understanding, as the Native taps Newport's chest and then his own, so as to acknowledge how they are both sentient beings. But this focus is quickly lost, as Natives pick up objects and are interpreted as thieves. They are assaulted or shot. Disruption and distrust follow, and the explorers find themselves lost at their fort. "We might as well be shipwrecked," Newport laments. The only language that ultimately seems to be universal is that of bartering (a notion that Malick disciple Kelly Reichardt plays with in her magnificent recent film, Meek's Cutoff). Objects like gunpowder and metals take precedence over symbolism and life.
Smith, who understands communication (when another Englishman shoots a Native, he takes the Englishman and suffocates him in water in front of the Natives, so that he can clearly show how the English are still friendly), is sent upriver to find the Native "king," Powhatan, and to trade with him. Smith's crew is lost and presumably killed by the Natives, while he stomps through the tall grass of the foreboding environment which comes to overwhelm him. He finds himself under attack in a marsh and surrenders. He tries bartering with his captors by showing off his gunpowder and a compass, attempting to draw the analogies of direction (sun, moon, East, West) with them.
Powhatan's judgment and proposed execution of John Smith is a perplexing moment where all continuity of experience is excised. A shaman lurks with menace while Powhatan takes counsel from his advisors and issues forth Smith's fate. He raises his arms and howls, and Malick cuts his film together in a way that is uneven and ecstatic, tearing us apart from a reliable ground for any dramatic framework. Just as the clubs are about to come down and kill Smith, the image cuts to black and silence is all. We then see Pocahontas laid out in front of him, protecting and asking for his life. The scene transforms into a kind of goosefleshed glory, as the Naturals ceremoniously resuscitate Smith, their hands on his chest and then fluttering upward, conveying the ascendency of his spirit. Malick cuts to the sails on a ship's mast falling, an image that seems nonsensical but is demonstrative of how Malick understands the psychology of human experience (similar mast images occur at the beginning of the film, when the Europeans discover the New World, and in the film's final movement, when Pocahontas has discovered the truer New World of England). Played so as ritual, I think Malick wants us to wonder whether Smith's trial/execution/salvation is real or a kind of performance of which he was unaware. He will serve a function for the tribe, who will use him in attempting to understand the Europeans' language and culture.
Smith feels like a child in his illusion of freedom, seeing the tribe as an ideal civilization which has "no sense of possession or jealousy." The love of freedom he has in this ethereal sabbatical (or imprisonment, depending on how you look at it) finds equal in his enthrallment of Pocahontas, the favorite of Powhatan's children who is loved by all in the tribe. Pocahontas has been enlisted by her father to draw information out of Smith, but their lush meandering through grass, often wordless, becomes the stuff of a remembered romance, set to music by Mozart's Piano Concerto No. 23, a piece of music from the late 18th century which reinforces notions of how everything we are seeing is memory, and reimagined as such. Malick has no such ambition to necessarily create an anthropologically correct vision of the early 17th century settlements and tribal cultures. There is no "objective" viewpoint for him, and we should think of The New World being a vision through the same glass of 19th century Transcendentalism that colored World War II for The Thin Red Line, similar to how Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter belongs much more to the 1850s than to the time in which it is set.
From Smith, Pocahontas first learns the words of the body: eyes, lips, ears, and then the forces of nature: wind, sun, moon, as if to imply the equivalency of Being that Malick holds for the personal self and the large oneness of Nature. My Beingness is grounded in Nature, linked to basic and universal objects. Pocahontas twirls around, singing "Wind" repeatedly, as if she was a part of the thing she was seeking to describe: in essence, it's not even a description, it is. She is wind. The word does not exist alone, in and of itself. We should compare Smith's education of Pocahontas to what she learns later, as an adopted colonial in Jamestown, from John Rolfe (Christian Bale). Rolfe turns pages of literature and learning for her, and lists out the days and months of Time (Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, etc). She then asks Rolfe, "What is a day?" What is a day? An hour? "Why does the earth have colors?" Rolfe is offguard, but completely charmed by Pocahontas' perspective, which has no sense of Time and the compartmentalization of concepts: She wants to get at the heart of language and definitions. Rolfe's own idealization of Pocahontas is voiced in his narration, "She weaves all things together." Everything flows together in and through her. "We're like grass," she tells Rolfe while he attempts to court her. The groundlessness of civilization acts in such a way that individuals are distracted and estranged from that Ground that "weaves all things together," enabling one to make metaphors and see an Other as a Self.
The early scenes between Smith and Pocahontas are some of the most incredibly sensual ever filmed. While not sexual, in the way Emmanuel Lubezki films the two actors we can see an immense longing of one flesh for another flesh, Smith's fingers coyly rolling along Pocahontas' arms in close up, James Horner's piano melody coming in like a gentle wind. Freedom and Life become abstracted in each other. "I was a dead man," he narrates, "Now I live. You, my light, my America. Love. Shall we deny it when it visits us? Shall we not take what we are given…There is only this, all else is unreal." She speaks to Nature in her own adoration of him: "Mother. Where do you live? In the sky? The clouds? The sea? Give me a sign. We rise. We rise. Afraid of myself. A god he seems to me. What else is life but being near you?" At this moment in Malick's montage of images we see Smith showing Pocahontas a reflective surface, so that she can see her reflection (earlier she seemed very interested in the word "Moon," and the moon is a symbol for reflection and identity, its presence being unreal, and merely the light reflected onto it). Her own self is being born, while she also feels utter unity with him. "Two no more. One. One. I am. I am." The music of Wagner again is roused on the score, as if Love itself were a New World of discovery to be colonized with possibilities and dreams. This is Malick's stages of New Worlds, all three set to Wagner's prelude: the first is geographical discovery, where ideals are placed onto land; the second is in love for another being; the third and final will be the great All, which is both immediate and eternal, Right Now, with us and with everybody, the Self of Malick's searches that bridges space, time, and all beings.
The ideal fades fast as Smith is sent on his way back to the fort. He has promised Powhatan that the Europeans will soon leave; if they do not, Powhatan will drive them off the land by force, "into the sea." The euphoria of the Forest Romance becomes a completely dissonant movement in The New World. The inhabitants of the fort are starving and diseased, with disarray governing everything. Language again becomes a key factor to how Malick wants us to process this highly frustrating section of the picture. The spoken dialogue here is barely coherent, as interior reflections of Smith collide with the rants of the colonials. At the base of our consciousness is our language. It is in that and the formulations of words and symbols we put together in reflection that we may grow and become more aware of Being. But as a character observes here, "Starvation does fearful things to men." Starvation, disease, impassioned and jealous love or sexual desire, and anger all function as unfortunate clouds to the coherence of words, where the body becomes driven by impulse. The world becomes an extroverted experience, barren of inwardness. The starving children accost Smith, asking where he's been and voicing information of what has happened in his absence: but they are maddeningly incoherent to us – and to Smith. They starve. There is no room for reflection or grace. They embody Nature at its most desperate, losing track of the You, which is the same as the explored "I." In this irritating segment, we notice one man (John Savage) yelling about sin and God, "Love good! Hate evil!" he shouts, his words literally dissolving into each other. But his words are that of a religious fanatic who has lost all sense. His sanctimony is flung out of his mouth. Men here are eating their belts, and cannibalizing corpses in desperation. "Bad water," Smith narrates, as we see a snake swimming. All is aggression, argument, and selfishness. Words themselves are deliberately so rough in their dialect that they harshly fall on top of each other without any meaning.
Smith is made the new president of the colony after Argall defends Smith and kills the tyrannical Wakefield (David Thewlis), who had convicted Smith "on a chapter of Leviticus" in his absence. But as president, Smith is unhappy in his relegated social duties. "It was a dream," he says of his time in the forest. "Now I am awake." The freedom of his love for Pocahontas can never be realized. "I love you, but I cannot love you." He contemplates a feather that serves as a private ornament, reminding him of her. "I let her love me. I made her love me." As president, he cannot take his duties lightly. And yet he tells himself, "Damnation is like this," his inner words over the social words he issues to two arguing colonials, who have come to odds because one thinks it is the 15th of October, the other the 17th (complete groundlessness, Heidegger would say). "The country is to them a misery, a death, a hell," Smith says of his men. "While they starve, they dig for gold. There is no talk, no hope, no work but this." The men will not work proficiently at making the fort work. Ironically, they also are existing in a private, subjective world. But whereas his experience opened him up, in their squalor they seal themselves shut.
Pocahontas arrives as the fort's salvation, defying her father by bearing food and seeds for agriculture. The Europeans look at her as a kind of world-saving goddess, but her true motivation is to be once more close to Smith. He warns her not to trust him, being cold. A key word is uttered by her as her fingers reach out to touch him: "Remember," not so much heard by us as clearly mouthed by her. Memory is a burden, a haunt more than an escape for a man living in bad faith and removed from what he really desires. It's not entirely clear where Malick is going as the action moves into Spring, as the Europeans trade with Natives, though Smith's mind is painfully elsewhere while the transaction is taking place. As the Native talks, he is thinking of Pocahontas. Smith voices the problem of money to the Native: "The source of all evil. It excuses vulgarity, makes wrong right, base noble." The tools of the Europeans will corrupt this other civilization. Smith finds relief once more with Pocahontas.
Together again, this is a calm repose for both individuals. "True," she narrates. "Is this the man I love? A ghost?" As president, he is not free. He is only half there with her, as with the bargaining Indians he is barely with them and thinking of her. "We can't go into the forest," he tells her. The other option, England, is too far away. Enough for her is to be with him. He reflects, "That fort is not the world. The river leads back there. It leads onward too. Deeper. Into the wild. Start over. Exchange this false life for a true one. Give up the name of Smith." She too has conflicts with her father, who has discovered that she has given seed to the Europeans, indicating that they have no plans of leaving. She is necessarily exiled. "How false I am," she thinks. "I have two minds…What was I? What am I now?" We see her looking at her eyes in a mirror, and then her shadow on rock, a Malickian motif denoting the presence of Being (and very pertinent to The Tree of Life). We all have two minds. In Smith especially we see the difference between spoken language, in how he communicates to his villagers, and inner language, where he wrestles with his confused soul.
Battles between the two cultures ensue, a war that is particularly painful to Smith being that he loves the enemy culture and feels that to open fire on them is to kill his own brethren; indeed, Pocahontas' actual brother will be one of the first to die. The other Europeans angrily project their hatred: "How can you own land!" one of them shouts, adding that the world should belong to those who can do right with it. Smith prays while bodies fall: "Lord, turn not away Thy face. You desire not the death of a sinner. I have gone away from You. I have not harkened to Your voice. Let us not be brought to nothing." His compassion for the savages is interpreted, correctly (as in Days of Heaven), as a forbidden love for the princess. His position as president is usurped and his resentful men torture him and put him to hard labor. Pocahontas is taken as a hostage and acculturated.
Newport returns and once more frees Smith, chiding Argall while doing so. But he also offers Smith an opportunity to run his own expedition, endorsed by King James I (Jonathan Pryce), "to chart the Northern coasts for a passage to the Indies." Just as the film stylistically has implanted its own dissonance in us as viewers, there is dissonance in Smith's soul. His desires, between geographical exploration and romantic fulfillment, conflict. He takes the king's post, asking that Pocahontas be told that he has died. With this news, she says that he has "killed the god in me." She wanders around Jamestown as a walking ghost, grieving in dirt: "Scorned. Cast out. Cut off. A dog. Come, death. Take me. Set me free. Let me be what I was." Her only repose is to look at trees, where we see a shaman (or a spirit?) talking to her.
It's here where Rolfe enters the story, observing her and saying, "When first I saw her she was regarded as someone finished, broken, lost." He falls in love with her, while in her broken-hearted grief she takes to him as a kind of protective shade, though she does not feel any sense of the same passion she did for Smith. She is baptized, renamed Rebecca, and has fully acclimated herself to European dress. But Rolfe's labyrinthine desire for her is grounded in a kind of desire to know the spaces not associated with her social self: "Who are you? What do you dream of?" We hear Malick's protagonists ask the same question of God, as Pocahontas does of the Earth Mother, Pvt. Train does of God in The Thin Red Line, and Jack O'Brien and his mother do in The Tree of Life.
There are then similarities, however more benign, here between The New World and Days of Heaven, where the woman is torn between a more passionate and earthy love, and a calm and stable one. Rolfe is similar to the Farmer, but his jealousy will not dominate him, perhaps because Pocahontas, unlike Abby, is completely honest with him. Even so, we hear the words "dreadful day of judgment" uttered by Newport during the marriage ceremony, just as we hear them during the marriage in Days of Heaven. But whereas Days of Heaven climaxed in apocalypse, The New World will conclude in an Earthly Paradise. In Rolfe's kindness, Rebecca senses echoes of the magnificence she once possessed: "He is like a tree. He shelters me. I lie in his shade…Mother, Your love is before my eyes. Show me Your way. Give me a humble heart." She has a child with Rolfe, Thomas, whom she loves dearly and teaches an appreciation for Nature and other beings, such as ducks and cows, another glimmer of Mother to Son that will be repeated and further developed in The Tree of Life, in which we will notice parallels of mercy to criminals, as both Pocahontas and Mrs. O'Brien - the capacious Earth Mother, giver of Life both - will give incarcerated men water.
Rebecca overhears that Smith is still alive, which almost effectively ends her relationship to Rolfe. She cannot be Rolfe's wife, because, in the most natural of ways, she is already "married" to Smith. "Married?" Rolfe asks when she has told him. "You don't know the meaning of the word exactly." That's a significant line, because it gets back to language and how, for Pocahontas/Rebecca, a word does not exist by virtue of itself. It is one with its definition (It also should make us think about her baptism and her acquisition of a new name). She loved and gave herself wholly to John Smith, and so is married to him, the essence preceding the name. Marriage is customarily an agreement, a contract, something written, preceding its definition, and so almost absurd. Pocahontas/Rebecca may not understand the meaning as it relates to the word, but she does understand the meaning, at its basic essence, in a way that no one else understands.
Rolfe's disposition is one of tragic acceptance. "Love made the bond," he says. "Love can break it too. There is that in her I shall not know." The pain of love and desire is that, as Malick understands, everything is subjective, and even in the most overpowering feeling of unity and vision of a river in which we are all flowing through, we are nevertheless still subjective. We can never know another's desire and possess it, a melancholy thought that we see in Bell's relationship to his unfaithful wife in The Thin Red Line.
Rolfe tries to remedy this splinter, by the fortune of having the King's invitation for himself and Rebecca to appear at the royal court in London. "Life has brought me to this strange new world," she says to one of her father's chiefs (Wes Studi) in London. For her, London is as peculiar and beautiful as Virginia was for Smith at the beginning. At Westminster Abbey, we may interpret her as being something to be ornamentally displayed, stared at as a curiosity like the caged raccoon (for which she has great sympathy) and a shackled bald eagle, images which continue Malick's interest in notions of imprisonment vs. the longing for absolute freedom. Whereas the world was unbounded in Virginia, London is laid out in sculpted stone, music set to perfect beats and constructed harmonies, with trees trimmed with symmetrical handsomeness. The myths of Christ's passion are displayed on stained glass windows. We might interpret these spaces as sterile, much as some will look at contemporary Houston in The Tree of Life, but I don't think that is Malick's aim. He finds this world beautiful also, even though it is also rife with distractions that result in groundlessness. "Mother, stay near me," Pocahontas says at this point. In her clothes, vanity mirror, and hair brush, we may see in Rebecca a mere ghost of the Pocahontas observed through nature. And yes, the outlay of London and Westminster Abbey displays how civilization is in its representation of our world a shadow. Something is lost, just as a few particulars are heightened.
The conclusion of the journey has Rebecca/Pocahontas confronting Smith, who has returned from his fruitless travels that found him stopped at the cliffs of Newfoundland. Rolfe understands that his belief to make Pocahontas love him was "vanity," and "that one cannot do that, or should not… I will not rob you of your self-respect." "You are the man I thought you were," she tells him, "and more." When Smith sees her, now as Rebecca, he admits that it feels like it is seeing her for the first time. He has remained changeless, trapped in the past, imprisoned by the lost chances for Love while searching for his Indies. He was sidetracked just as Mr. O'Brien finds himself in The Tree of Life. He confesses to her his torture: "I thought it was a dream, what we knew in the forest. It's the only truth." He lost touch with the glory in bending himself to a social duty, falling in line with the objective, exterior voice instead of the interior one, which originally guided him "towards the best." "Did you find your Indies, John?" she asks. "You shall." He is overcome with remorse. "I may have sailed past them."
Rebecca is reconciled with her present, being with Rolfe and living as a citizen in the large structure of a sculpted civilization. Playing hide and seek with her son, Thomas, maneuvering around thick hedges, Wagner's prelude once more begins. She is not Rebecca, nor is she Pocahontas (the classic name is, after all, not once uttered in the film, and Malick relies on us to know our own mythology), even though she is both. She has discovered the glory in every moment which was always with her, and so is everywhere. The incident of spaces and times are like masks that Eternity wears, something wholly abstracted in The Tree of Life, where during the "Shores of Eternity" sequence we see a floating mask. "Mother," Rebecca/Pocahontas reflects, closing her eyes, "now I know where You live." Malick does not spell out the concrete answer for us, because it is not concrete. It's felt by Pocahontas. It is intuited.


This epiphany cross-cuts with Rolfe's written narration of how Rebecca has died, an event that for Thomas will one day "be a far and distant memory." We see Rolfe mourning at her bedside, the two figures reflected in a picture frame. "She gently reminded me all must die," he says, and this moment powerfully recalls the death of Witt's mother in The Thin Red Line, where the Mother is joined to her own child self, her spirit. Rebecca does cartwheels, and it is apparent that she is one with her original self, Pocahontas. Her death bed, empty, cuts to the opposite view where a shaman sits, looking back. Another angle shows the shaman, who may well be Pocahontas/Rebecca's spirit, running freely through a doorway, into the wild. Rolfe's ship docks back in Virginia, the camera returning Pocahontas to her home, just as we see her gravesite at Gravesend, England. There is no more Time. Eternity is present: she can dance and run with joy just as she can die and be buried, and then have her spirit return to the land of her birth. Just as there is no time, there is no division here. This is a challenge for us when Hollywood has conditioned us to look at colonial dramas as being Nature Good, Civilization Bad, as if the binary was irreconcilable. Malick certainly has his heart in Nature, but he understands that the dichotomy is a false one. Everything flows into everything else, much as Past, Present, and Future do. The music ends with water flowing over rocks in the Virginian wilderness, a tree looming over us. It is not until we see a creature (Insect? Bird? Maybe a flying squirrel?) fly away from the tree that Malick ends his picture, perfectly.
The New World is a document that lays out our language, histories, and civilizations, a beautiful revelation of false contradictions, how nothing is permanent just as how it is nothing but. In observing spoken language, both interior and exterior, Malick magisterially makes the language of cinema startling and new also, looking for a filmic syntax that is expressive of who we are, how we think, how we reflect, our consciousness. The film plays out, much more radically than The Thin Red Line and Days of Heaven, as a collage of fragments, or moments that cannot be held onto though they linger on in their unlikely unity later on as endless echoes.



Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Terrence Malick's Song of Himself III - The Thin Red Line: The Unanswered Question















"Help me see things the way You do."

This is the muttering of Sgt. McCron (John Savage) following the first elongated sequence of military battles in Terrence Malick's The Thin Red Line. We first saw McCron praying with the 12 men he was put in charge of, then prepping them by reminding them, "You gotta breathe, mister!" Now we see that his entire squad has been lost to enemy fire, and he cannot wrap around his head around it. "I lost all twelve," he repeats to the other soldiers. He trained them, he told them what to do, and still lost them all. And why did he have to live? At dusk he stands up tall and screams into the hills, "Who decides who's going to live? Who decides who's going to die? This is futile! I can stand right up here and nothing happens to me!" Because of his practice of the Lord's prayer when we first saw him, we can assume that McCron is a man with deep faith. But now he has been crushed by God, to the extent that he shakes while looking at his own identity tag to remind himself of who he is. The Self has been eradicated, as the Self is throughout this film and throughout Malick's body of work. McCron tears away at the grass and says, "That's us, that's us. We're just dirt," a realization which the meat-grinder of combat compels us to understand as being true. "Help me see things the way You do. Help me see things the way You do."
The ability to see things the way the great, cosmic, benevolent and presumably loving God does is the plea of human beings going through all kinds of anxiety, from combat to poverty to cancer to a romantic separation, seeking to understand. But we demand our own individual existence to be acknowledged and felt, like Stephen Crane's man who screamed "I exist!" to a universe that shrugged in return. Made 20 years after Days of Heaven, we can only imagine what happened in the director's personal life to compel him to begin asking questions to the great "You," as his narrators do in all three subsequent films. This "You" takes many forms: a Judeo-Christian notion of God; a more universal and abstract vision of divinity; the Earth mother of Pocahontas; an absent love. Malick's characters are burrowing into the universe looking for answers, or at least someone to listen to their questions. They encounter the sublime through themselves. The Thin Red Line is interested in the despair and grief of a death that captures all. We come into the world alone, dream alone, and so will leave it alone, being nothing more than "just dirt." Is it possible to taste that ecstatic consciousness, the answer and clarity that the mad McCron is begging for? What is the "thin red line" of the title, anyway? In Kipling, it's the 'thin red line' defining "heroes," or there's a Midwestern saying telling of the thin red line dividing the sane from the mad, but isn't it also the line that separates us from each other? The line that separates our waking, conscious egos from the transcendent possibilities of awareness? The I-It from the I-Thou? Something that we can only taste in rare instances, small moments before it passes on in time?
The main criticism of The Thin Red Line is that it feels like an incomplete movie, evidenced by the many characters who have had their parts cut down, in some cases to nothing. These are more like ghosts than fully developed, rich characters that we are accustomed to. And yet the exhortation is issued, "Maybe all men got one big soul who everybody's a part of. All faces of the same man. One big self. Everyone looking for salvation by himself...each like the coal, drawn from the fire." The mass of faces we see in The Thin Red Line's Charlie Company, and even the Japanese foes we see later on, all are part of this fire, just as we are all part of the fire in the dark screening room, bridging past and present as Malick bridges the one to the many, the immanent to the Eternal. The Thin Red Line could never be complete, and indeed its sense of incompleteness only adds to its texture and so completes it. The film is unfinishable, like a sand painting. It does not sell itself as a "gritty" true-to-life war movie, the same way Saving Private Ryan did the same year, and yet it feels like one of the most psychologically realistic motion pictures ever made.
The question of Death and being able to accept it ties into this problem of the One to the Many. If Malick has a main character, it is Pvt. Witt (Jim Caviezel). The film is his journey, beginning with a memory he has while being AWOL, living in a kind of paradise with Melanesians. "I remember my mother when she was dying. She was all shrunk up and grey. I was afraid to touch the death I seen in her. I couldn't find anything beautiful or uplifting about her going back to God. I asked her if she was afraid. She just shook her head. I heard people talk about immortality, but I ain't seen it." Witt is looking at a Melanesian mother with her own child, wading in a pool of water. He then ceases to talk and looks down, reflecting. Malick cuts to Witt's childhood home, where the mother is patting the grieving hands of an individual we can presume to be Witt's father. Malick also cuts to two birds in a cage together. The memory seems to become pure abstraction, when the mother looks to the other side of the room and sees a young girl in white. Is this an angel? A messenger of God? Or is it her own younger self? The image cuts to the white dress, where an immaculate, heart-like design is embroidered, complemented by a beating sound. Realism is suspended absolutely and we see the Mother embracing the Child/Angel, pressing her face with a smile to the Mother's chest. They are as a single entity. Ending the memory is a moment of unparalleled and audacious beauty, as John Toll's camera arcs upwards to the ceiling, but there is no ceiling. Only the freedom of the deep white sky, which becomes the same sky of the Melanesian islands.
"I wondered how it'd be when I died," Witt narrates. "To know that this breath was going to be the last you was ever going to draw. I wondered if I could meet it the same way she did. With the same" – and there's a conspicuous beat – "calm. Because that's where it's hidden. The immortality I hadn't seen." The immortality is in that space beyond words and language, where Nature thrives, the place where Witt's prayer has a beat before he uses the word "calm." As an AWOL soldier removed from the cold steel and rust of the military, he sees glimmers of his immortality. His perception has reshaped the world. He talks to the Melanesian mother. "Kids here never seem to fight," he says. "Sometimes," she smiles bashfully, "sometimes when we see them playing, sometimes they always fight." Malick is making it clear that this kind of pre-technological civilization is no Rousseauian paradise, but Witt perceives it as such and – thus perceived subjectivity – so it is. That's how Witt sees it, and so it is real. Malick's (and Witt's) gaze rests on this mother for a long moment, then jump-cuts to her laughing, implying that there is a kind of break from an "objective" reality in Witt's bliss. He is molding the world through subjectivity, and we notice how a father and son sitting together are neatly framed through a doorway, like artistic impressions (Malick does this throughout The New World and in many instances throughout The Tree of Life).
But the intrusion of a patrol boat ends Witt's luxuriating. In the ship's holding cell, he is interrogated by the man who will be his opposite, Sgt. Welsh (Sean Penn), who believes the world is blowing itself to hell before it can understand what it's doing. "In this world," Welsh tells Witt, "a man himself is nothing. And there ain't no world but this one." Witt says that Welsh is wrong. "I've seen another world. Sometimes I felt it was just my imagination." "Well then you're seeing things I'll never see," Welsh answers, who lays down the bare facts to Witt regarding the state of war and how it makes life cheap. "In a situation like that, all a man can do is shut his eyes and let nothing touch him. Look out for himself."
Malick has, in the first 15 minutes, laid the groundwork for awesome binaries to contemplate: the meaning of one life versus the lives of multitudes; despair of death versus acceptance; the brutality of Nature set alongside its beauty. Witt aspires to the freedom that we feel in his memory of the dying Mother, a death chamber where the soul is freed and there is no ceiling. Welsh and the blunt, militaristic reality locks people in and away from each other, just as the domineering and harsh Col. Tall (Nick Nolte) confesses to himself that he's "shut up in a tomb" and "can't lift the lid," "dying slow as a tree." In the tomb, all we have is our attentiveness, our memory, which liberates Witt just as it liberated Proust in Remembrances of Things Past, who was taken back several years by a the taste and texture of a madeleine. In The Thin Red Line we see Witt lighting matches (the motif of Light being important, the "fire" of the One Big Self) and staring at the cold walls of his cell. Somehow, these walls take him to a place that have absolutely no resemblance to them: being a child, reaching for hay in the wind as his father works. It's a mind-boggling moment, but if we understand what Malick is telling us about our consciousness, which is without frame and working ceaselessly, it is essential to The Thin Red Line's understanding and ambition to channel the Self. This is a practice that will be further worked with in The New World, where there are sequences of which we aren't sure are set in the present or are remembered moments from the past, or even if they are mere romantic fantasy. The whole of The Tree of Life is a memory, including the flashback to the beginning of Time. And as the act of remembering changes those memories, reshaping the past as it recalls them, the sense of what we believe as "realistic" is suspended. That is the significance of the Angel/Child in the house without ceiling in earlier remembrances of Witt, similar to moments denoting birth in The Tree of Life, or the Mother's grace which has so affected the child that as an adult he recalls her as sometimes floating. It is cinematic impressionism, but neuroscience has shown how the Impressionists actually had the process of human thinking much more correctly than the late 19th century Materialists and Realists. Whitman too was influenced by Darwin and the science of the second half of the 19th century, but still could not get past how "the ineffable remains." All of The Thin Red Line's binaries relate to the process of the Self with its ineffable mystery and workings.
*
There is much confusion about the voiceovers in The Thin Red Line, being that instead of a single narrator, like in Badlands and Days of Heaven, there are multiple voices here, as there will be with all subsequent Malick films. Only the most careful viewer will recognize the voice that begins and closes the picture, as it is not Witt (a common mistake) or a character played by a familiar actor, of which The Thin Red Line is overstuffed with. Given the similarities in deep, Texan drawl, one could almost wonder if it's someone doing an impression of Malick, whose voice we know from the walk-on cameo he does in Badlands (and the numerous impressions offered by some of his actors). But the voice belongs to a non-actor cast by Malick named John Dee Smith, a mechanic when the director first met him, who plays a private named Edward Train. We see him first frantically talking to Welsh, saying, "The only things that are permanent are dying and the Lord." As frantic, naive, and frazzled as he appears in this early scene, his voice becomes the calm querying seeker of The Thin Red Line. We may even recognize a Biblical verse tattooed on his arm: 1 John 4:4, which reads, "You, dear children, are from God and have overcome them, because the one who is in you is greater than the one who is in the world."
The allusion becomes highly significant, particularly when we connect it to the voice that begins and ends this journey, making profound commentaries in between. From Malick's Transcendentalist viewpoint, the verse seems to take on a universal meaning that goes beyond the perimeters of Christian dogma and scripture: All are from God, and God in You – who is You – is so in all of us, and greater than the smaller self that separates I from Thou. In another biblical text credited to John, The Gospel of John, a very densely textured book if one studies it, there is appealing material for a philosophical linguist like Malick, being that it begins, "In the beginning there was the Word," the logos, and Christ was the Word made Flesh. The Word was God, and with the Word, so was God. Language and consciousness evolved together, and with its mirror realization, so our deep inner sense of Being (God) was born. The Word, in our own philosophy, is our consciousness, and so our conscious, attentive Self is as God, bringing Light into the world, trying to pierce through the Darkness. Language is our attempt to parcel out the chaos of phenomenology. We are that Self, a part and parcel of that God, that Over-Soul, the Transparent Eyeball that is All. It lives as long as we ask, "Who are You?" It is lost when our consciousness gets caught up "in the world," in Heidegger's "groundlessness."
We first hear the voice set alongside Faure's Requiem, a Death Mass that nevertheless is burgeoning with the promise of resurrection and rebirth, played out against Witt paddling on water. Looking up to the sun through the great trees that seem to consume each other in nature, Train's voice asks, "What's this war in the heart of Nature? Why does Nature vie with itself? The Land contend with the Sea? Is there an avenging power in Nature? Not one power, but two?" We love to split things into Good and Evil, Right and Wrong, Beautiful and Ugly. Up close, we get blinded in the passion of judgment, having desire and dislike, yearning and hate. What's Hate to a crocodile, though? To a bird? To a tree? Malick is seeking to grapple with the character of Nature, from his opening image of a toothy salt water crocodile, a breathing relic from the Dinosaur Age, crawling into murky water and eventually descending, invisible. The crocodile is certainly an image that we may fear, and yet the way Malick films it rouses a certain reverence, just as he will attempt to do with the dinosaurs in The Tree of Life. Humankind dominates Nature, however, just as its own impulses are governed by it: we will see a similar crocodile captured by the soldiers later on, tied up, seemingly benign, but ultimately unpredictable, which is more unsettling considering that the lassoed crocodile immediately precedes the moment that Pvt. Bell (Ben Chaplin) will discover his beloved wife wants to leave him for an Air Force captain. Bell's wife was his own calm, the object of his prayers. Like McCron, though more sane, he seems lost after receiving the news.
*
The Thin Red Line seems to affirm Train's folk wisdom: the only permanent things are "dying" and the "Lord." And from a certain perspective, they are one in the same. When infantrymen are shot down, at times seeming to recognize that their last moments are approaching, Malick will cut to the wide perspective of Nature, the clouds sweeping over the blowing grass, or the light shining through leaves eaten through by caterpillars. In such moments we can see both the impersonal glare of Nature and the magisterial glory of something divine. The ugly is woven together with the beautiful. Malick's technique for laying out his narrative reminds me of Whitman's practice of "cataloguing," where the poet would have single verses detailing specific images, seemingly unrelated but like our own thoughts and memories, part of a whole (the "Song of Myself"). Some of the images are simple, some urban, some melancholy and grotesque (a suicide). Whitman takes us into a moment, a fragment of the whole, in order so that we get a sense of how large the One is. He writes, "And these tend inward to me, and I tend outward to them, / And such as it is to be of these more or less I am, / And of these one and all I weave the song of myself."
Train's voice-over begins to ask questions again, over images of soldiers moving, Melanesians (strikingly bereft of anxiety when juxtaposed against the soldiers) guiding them, and bodies blown apart on yellow grass. "Who are You that live in all these many forms? Your death that captures all. You too are the source of all that's going to be born." Again, like in Whitman, Death and Birth represent a false binary. The voice-over continues, "You're glory. Mercy. Peace. Truth. You give calm a spirit. Understanding. Courage. The contented heart." As these last words are recited, Malick cuts to highly stylized, transcendentally sexual memories/fantasies of Bell with his wife (Miranda Otto), indicating that to him, she, his love, is his own kind of God, a kind of romanticism we see in the Farmer's attitude towards Abby in Days of Heaven, and Pocahontas to John Smith in The New World ("A god he seems to me," her voiceover says). There is a danger is such terrestrial romanticism, which is nevertheless the consolation lovers look for. Bell's voice says while climbing a hill, "Why should I be afraid to die?" His wife's face looks on from their domestic window. "I belong to you," he continues. She is preternatural in her being, less a person than a divinity. "Come out," her voice tells him as he approaches danger. "Come out to where I am." She is Death, but the warmth of Death -- which is Eternal Life. And yet, he comes to learn, she is an illusion and temporal. The God was in him the whole time, and only in him, and being a projection of romantic love, it amounts to selfishness; there is no refuge in its absence. (I am reminded of how Michael Mann shot the intimate scene between John Dillinger and Billie Frechette in Public Enemies, which seems to be modeled on how Bell and his wife interact here; Mann used some of Hans Zimmer's Thin Red Line score in his film, possibly as an allusion. Dillinger, like the soldiers here, has burrowed himself into subjectivity as a path to freedom).


Another dichotomy of character is examined in Captain Staros (Elias Koteas) and Colonel Tall (Nick Nolte), representing dual visions of a Father Figure. Early on, Staros is resented by some of his men, who believe that he leads Charlie Company into the worst possible situations, allowing them to be screwed over. But Staros is sincere in his prayers to "not betray his men." He does not know with certainty that God is on his side, but begs into the candle light, "Are You here? Let me not betray You…In You I place my trust." During battle, it's Staros who is sensitive to how so many of his men are no more than children (Nicholas Stahl plays a private who dies in Staros' arms, and by virtue of his looks he appears no more than an adolescent). Commanding Staros from a distance is Tall, an aging colonel who's been passed over and is now desperate to grab this chance to impress his superiors in "his first war." To do so, he will order Staros to attack head on into enemy area. Both men know that "lives will be lost," but the price is worth it for Tall, whereas for Staros it is unethical.
Maybe it should also be pointed out that Staros is, in a way, Malick's own invention in his adaptation of James Jones' novel. In the book, Staros is Captain Stein, a Jewish soldier. Here, renamed Staros, he is Greek. Observe how Tall quotes the beginning of Homer to Staros, "Rosy Fingered Dawn," in Greek. "You're Greek, aren't you captain? You ever read Homer? We read Homer at the Point. In Greek." Any reader of Homer will know the importance Homer places on the relationships between fathers and sons. Tall spouts Homer, but does he understand the sentimental bonds of Telemachus and Odysseus? We learn that he's ashamed of his son, who's "a bait salesman." To compensate for failure, he seeks achievement, and achievement in the adopted "sons" he has in his fold (like John Cusack's honorable soldier). Staros, on the other hand, is truly Homeric in his protection of the soldiers, all of whom he sees as his sons, even telling them in Greek that they have been as such. "You're all my sons. My beloved sons. I'll hold you in me forever. You'll be with me wherever I go," he narrates when leaving Guadalcanal. He would rather face a court martial than send his boys into a suicide mission. His spirit goes beyond boundaries, the voiceover even eulogizing a dead Japanese soldier. This is the voice of Grace.
In Tall's defense, even though he is probably the most antagonistic figure in the film (and maybe, as performed by Nolte, the film's most dominating performance), there is hidden insight to him, and a deep degree of reflective self loathing. His interior monologue reveals Malick's interest in how the interior voice of our deep self differs from the social self that speaks in respectable quips of either clever dialogue or polite discourse. A general (John Travolta) speaks to Tall about the mission, but Tall's mind fills us in on how he's really feeling: "Work my ass off. Brown-nose the generals. For me. For my family." There's a beautiful strain in Nolte's voice here. "All they sacrificed for me. Poured out like water on the ground. All I might have given for love's sake. Too late. Dying. Slow as a tree." Tall's need to be remembered and declaratively affirm his life through medals and titles is the deficit of human nature that needs to dominate and be satisfied, as we see in Badlands, the greedy characters in Days of Heaven, and Mr. O'Brien in The Tree of Life, another father whose need for love cancels out his grace. With time running out and passing by, these characters only see death (dying slow as a tree). The price is chaotic outbursts of passion, like the Farmer burning his land, Mr. O'Brien losing his temper, and Tall here embracing vainglorious military strategy, which may produce victory but will also put more lives in danger. At the end, after the achievement of victory and having dismissed Staros, he sits alone, peering at the bodies of soldiers. He has no words left, inside his spirit or outside to fill the air (playing "a role I never conceived"). His breath is almost stifled and we may notice that he's overcome with emotion in his tragic solitude.
Tall puts his faith in property, which is what most of us put our faith in. It is the concretization of achievement and value, and so the truest mark of the man looking for salvation on his own, "the coal drawn from the fire." His philosophy is justified in the present by Ayn Randian simplicity. As he says to Staros, "Look at this jungle. Look at those vines, the way they twine around the trees, swallowing everything. Nature's cruel, Staros." There is the war in the heart of Nature, as opposing elements vie for power. That is what we think about in evolution and Darwinism (which is really from the mind of Herbert Spencer). Without the mark of achievement and will to power, one is rabble, dead meat, "dirt," and as we see in the film, dog food. Is there an avenging power in Nature? Tall believes there is, or at least he needs to believe there is. In The Tree of Life, Nature is further examined and explained as the element that requires affirmation, a love demanding devotion and reward, disliking criticism and rejection. Grace, Malick's binary to Nature, accepts all.
The achievements of The Thin Red Line, an Academy Award nominee (though winning nothing) and Berlin Golden Bear winner, and the recent controversy over The Tree of Life at Cannes, where Malick notoriously declined attendance at the press conference or Palme d'Or ceremony, may be seen as a very loud way of accepting accolades (as Peter Ustinov famously insinuated regarding George C. Scott's marked refusal to accept an Academy Award). But Malick's work seems to perfectly explain his position. After Welsh boldly delivers morphine to a soldier whose guts have been blown out, Staros applauds him and says that he's going to recommend him for the "Silver Star" and other medals of bravery. Welsh shuts him up. "Property," Welsh says, angry and exasperated. "The whole fucking thing's about property." In this respect, are movies so different from war?
*


The human soldiers are extensions of Tall's descriptions of the vines that seek to consume and dominate. They are the conscious evolution of the crocodile which they have now captured and conquered. "War don't ennoble men," Train's voiceover reminds us. "It turns them into dogs. Poisons the soul." When Charlie Company finally takes the Japanese snipers' position, we see the dominating animal come out. In some of the company, there is absolutely no intimation that the Japanese soldiers are even of the same species. They are simply murderers who want to kill soldiers, soldiers being strictly American soldiers. Later on, we notice another American reveling in his sadism. He collects the teeth of his enemies, and tells a Japanese commander, "I'm going to sink my teeth into you now. See them birds up there?" He points to some vultures coasting overhead. "They're going to eat you raw. Where you're going there's no coming back from." His interior voice is not much different: "What are you to me? Nothing." This soldier may remind one of a perversion of self righteousness that we find in the Gospel of Luke, where the author describes Hell. Train's voice asks over images of suffering and sadism: "This great Evil…Where does it come from? How did it steal into the world? What seed, what root did it grow from? Who's doing this? Who's killing us? Robbing us of life and light? Mocking us with the sight of what we might have known? Does our ruin benefit the earth? Does it help the grass to grow, the sun to shine?" Malick's camera is on a Japanese face. "Is this darkness in you too? Have you passed through this night?" Train's questions are then conjoined with Malick's musical selection, Charles Ives' "The Unanswered Question," which also necessarily relates to the quandaries of Emerson and American Transcendentalism given the composer's relationship to Concord.

There is the other perspective, though, which suffers with the enemy. Staros' voice lays out as smoke drifts over a dead Japanese face: "Are you righteous? Kind? Does your confidence lie in this? Are you loved by all? Know that I was too. Do you imagine that your sufferings will be less because you loved goodness? Truth?" Staros' voice transcends Staros' own being, becoming the soul of the Japanese soldier. This is a transparent consciousness, free, unbounded, the "death that captures all," the voice of God maybe, not all knowing so much as all suffering. Witt has this consciousness, and aids a grieving Japanese man, laying his rifle down to hold the trembling hand. In watching people die, Witt wants to look at them so as to look into them, it seems, to capture their souls and hold their permanence within him, giving his own life to them as they give theirs to him.
In the middle of all this is Welsh, who is essentially us, Malick's secular humanist audience, and the same audience that will be resistant to the transcendent glimmers in The Tree of Life. Andrew O'Hehir is not too different from Welsh in his judgment of The Tree of Life's 'Shores of Eternity,' which seems like an afterlife (but I believe is more of an abstraction), when he says, "I'm not buying it." Welsh cannot understand how Witt "believes in the beautiful light." Why does Witt want to be in Charlie Company? He's "just running into a burning house where nobody can be saved. What difference you think you can make? One single man in all this madness? If you die, it's going to be for nothing. There's not some other world out there where everything's going to be okay. There's just this one. Just this rock."
Materially, Welsh is right. The "other world" of Witt, which might be "just his imagination" is subjective, a heavenly glow cast on a real world that is fraught with death and madness. A single man can't make a difference. Welsh understands the truth of war as he understands the truth of all governing structures. "Everything a lie," he narrates near the film's completion. "Everything you hear, everything you see. So much to spew out. They just keep coming, one after another. You're in a box, a moving box. They want you dead. Or in their lie." This could apply to government, military, private employment, entertainment, and education, where it is demanded that the individual live in bad faith in order to be successful, in harsh contrast to a dream of freedom. It is technically true. In a world where the facts continue to mount against the illusions of faith, and things are increasingly material and progress nearly inconceivable, how can Malick regress into this "God stuff," whether it's New Age Celestine Prophecy Bullshit or arcane Christianity?
Though he is at first condescending, Welsh is moved to be almost envious of Witt. "Still believing in the beautiful light, are you?" he asks in an empty house (which has, we will notice, an empty birdcage, and so recalls Witt's childhood home that we saw in his memory of the Mother's death). "How do you do that? You're a magician to me." "You care about me, sergeant." Witt understands how Welsh is compassionate, but then he asks, "Why do you sometimes make yourself out to be a rock?" I wonder if it's not naïve to wonder if the two men are dual representations of Malick's own nature, considering how the man that Witt is addressing corresponds in many ways to the isolated, intensely private Malick described by some people who know him (an ex-wife explains how she was not allowed to enter his office or borrow his books; when reading books in public, he would deliberately hide the covers so that no one could know what he was reading). The binary conflicts are not wholly resolved in The Thin Red Line, because a person rarely – if ever – is resolved. The Unanswered Questions remain, as we are Half-Devil and Half-Angel in Days of Heaven, many are Half-Witt and Half-Welsh in The Thin Red Line, or Half-Tall and Half-Staros.
The best Witt can tell Welsh is, "I still see a spark in you." That spark, again, the "light," the fire from which we are individually drawn and to which Staros prays at night (we even see it backlighting a Buddha statue at one point, the ashes dancing into the night sky), is "all in all in all of us." Welsh, like Witt, would give his life for his fellow man, but Welsh struggles to get past the "rock," whether that stone is the Earth or his own numb heart. Maybe altruism is more natural than we are led to suspect, and we even find the grace of altruism in nature (something more dealt with in The Tree of Life). Indeed, in our educated and aware liberal humanist shells, it's not fashionable to think of Witt's Zen, or struggle towards Whitman's or Emerson's Over-Soul perspective. We see the other side which revels in stifling fanaticism and denial. How is Witt's perspective different?
"One man looks at a dying bird and thinks there's nothing but unanswered pain. That death's got the final word. It's laughing at him." This is Train's sage voiceover, as Malick's camera overlooks Welsh, awake and depressed. He then cuts to Witt, sleeping soundly. "Another man sees that same bird. Feels the glory. Feels something smiling through it." "Do you see O my brothers and sister?" Whitman asks. "It is not chaos or death – it is form, union, plan – it is eternal life – it is Happiness." It is audacious to suggest such an emboldened affirmation, when Malick even shows us a picture of that dying hatchling, doomed and crying out in agony, as his men in combat are also trapped. The dying bird is an image more ambitiously framed in The Tree of Life, with the dying plesiosaur, who is both the Book of Job's ferocious Leviathan, emblem of the jealous Yahweh, just as he is a Hobbesian allusion to Nature; but the plesiosaur, gash on its side, is also a reference to Christ, the lapis fish, an image of forgiveness and Eternity. For Malick, and for Witt, Heaven and Hell co-exist. Sympathy consoles even in furious selfishness. The Thin Red Line works to contain multitudes, contradicting itself in its largeness.
Witt will give his life to save the platoon, becoming a decoy by luring the Japanese in the wrong direction. He finds himself in a clearing, surrounded (like Kit in Badlands, Bill in Days of Heaven, and like John Smith will find himself early on in The New World). An enemy soldier yells at him, his gun poised. It is significant that Malick chooses not to use subtitles here, as we are left to interpret what words the soldier is saying. He sounds threatening, but apparently he is actually asking Witt to surrender his weapon and that he does not want to kill him. But Malick is interested in how we each live in our own worlds, and it is in that world, alone, that we connect to any sense of bliss or reconciliation with the rest of the world. Witt, as far as he can tell, understands that this is the moment of his death. He is encountering the hypothetical situation he wondered about at the beginning of his journey. He has somehow found the mother's calm. He does not drop his gun. He looks into the abyss and raises it as a Kierkegaardian knight of faith.
Malick cuts to the sensation of Paradise, as Witt wades in the water, a sensation of death's indestructibility that he raises to transcendent heights elsewhere, during The New World's ending moments, as Pocahontas/Rebecca seems to have elevated herself above Time and Mortality, and The Tree of Life's conclusion on the Shores of Eternity, where the protagonist, Jack O'Brien, does not only seem to be reconciled with his father, but also embraces his own younger self (Hunter McCracken), as well as the brother he grew up with and lost to suicide. This abstraction is in the subjectivity of the character – or the subjectivity of the artist Malick – and should not at all be interpreted as a literal landscape. But it is, Malick like Whitman would tell us, real. All we are, all we see, all we love, are ourselves. Welsh stands by Witt's grave and asks, "Where's your spark now?" He halts tears, as if the sense of emotion is the answer to his cold, "frozen up" disposition.
Welsh's thoughts wander. "Only one thing a man can do. Find something that's his. Make an island for himself." Then he adds, rather puzzlingly, "If I never meet you in this life, let me feel the lack. A glance from your eyes, and my life will be yours." This is the answer to the Lie he contemplated moments before. Welsh's words imply that the escape for which human beings long is a seemingly impossible paradox, of deep sympathy for other beings (where there seemingly is no line between the extended and unextended), and deep introspection, as one is to "make an island for himself." One of the many fascinating things about Malick's war film is that it bypasses sociopolitical or historical ends. It wants to understand the Universal problem of suffering, grief, and the will to power. The tree of life in this film is also the tree of death. Malick separates himself from New Age euphoria by his embrace of the dark, which cancels itself out with the light. Each being goes on his own private journey, either seeking salvation and achievement for himself, or seeking to identify with "the light." Death stalks all, a feeling magnificently executed by Malick and cinematographer John Toll by way of the Akela Crane, a remote controlled camera crane able to traverse over the rough grassy terrain, feet away from the actors, surpassing the most effective Steadicam shot. Light and Space cannot impede Malick, no more than a human being can evade death.
"Where is it that we were together?" Train's voice asks as the military boat, the "floating graveyard," leaving Guadalcanal, faces staring out into space and into the dark of rifles that peer back. "Who were you that I lived with? Walked with? The brother. The friend." These are once more faces of the past, departing from the subjective voice, and it also anticipates The Tree of Life in how "the brother" certainly holds a deeply sentimental tie to the filmmaker's own deceased brother. Malick emulates and slightly rewords Wordsworth to end his film: "Darkness and light. Strife and love. Are they the workings of One Mind? The features of the same face? O my Soul, let me be in You now. Look out through my eyes, look out at the things You made. All things shining." Malick is telling us that we are all Creators as perceivers, indeed even as voyeurs in a movie audience. The Thin Red Line is much more than a war film. It is nearly a religious text, bearing its own creation myth. The brute force of the military boat piercing through the ocean dissolves to the placid water of the Melanesians, Nature overlooking. On the beach, there is a coconut sprouting. The waves roll in rhythmically. Is this an image of New Life or Death? For Malick it is the same thing. All things shining. Soaring above Good and Evil, whereas most movies are mere representations of life, The Thin Red Line boldly achieves the exhausted and exasperated feeling of having lived it